Global Research Publishing House

Peer Review Policy

All journals published by Global Research Publishing House employ a double-blind peer-review process.

Submitted manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to determine their suitability for the journal’s aims and scope. Manuscripts deemed appropriate for review are evaluated by at least two independent experts selected based on their expertise in the relevant field.

Reviewers assess submissions based on originality, methodological rigor, scientific quality, clarity, ethical compliance, and relevance.

Editors make publication decisions based on reviewer recommendations and their own professional judgment.

All participants in the peer-review process are expected to maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Individuals with conflicts of interest that could compromise the objectivity of the review process will not participate in the evaluation of the manuscript.

The peer-review process is conducted in a fair, impartial, and timely manner to ensure the quality and integrity of published research.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.